8 Ways To Instantly Attract New Clients: FREE GUIDE

Solicitors Guide, 8 Ways To Instantly Increase Your Profits.
  • Generate clients from your website
  • Avoid fatal mistakes
  • Increase your profits:- instantly
  • Win referrals simply and regularly.
  • Much more
Email:
Name:
Surname:
Practice Name:
Do You Have Questions?

Ask A Law Firm Marketing Question Now

Follow Me On Twitter?
Follow Nick Jervis On Twitter

Archive for April, 2010

Bluestone vs Centre Parcs / Which Resort Wins?

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

Over the Easter Holidays we paid a visit to Bluestone Resort in Pembrokeshire. This is the first time we have been to the two year old resort. We have been to Center Parcs several times before.

For those of you that do not know either of them, you stay in chalets or log style cabins, no cars are allowed on site when you have offloaded your luggage and you cycle or walk everywhere. Use of a large swimming pool with a wave machine and outdoor hot tubs is free to use. Center Parcs then encourages you to use their other facilities, all of which cost a lot of money. Once in Center Parcs they like you to stay on site and spend, spend spend.

However, Bluestone encourages you to visit the beautiful Pembrokeshire Coast and surrounding areas. It is a much smaller site and although it does have activities you are not constantly reminded about them or encouraged to try them. There is less to do, but because it is in such a beautiful setting, if you have the beautiful weather which we did, there is enough walking in woods, swimming and cycling to keep you entertained.


Center Parcs was the dominant force for many years if you wanted a holiday of this type. I think this dominance has show signs of complacency and disregard for their customers as often happens with bigger companies. For example, on one visit I made most of the entire outdoor swimming pool was shut for maintenance for the entire week. When we challenged the staff on reception why they had not advised us of this when we booked the response was “well we knew you would not book then”. Now if you bear in mind that practically the only free entertainment you receive is the swimming, to shut the pool and not tell customers shows a real lack of respect for them. On complaining, we were offered a £50 discount off our next visit. Next visit? You have to be joking!

Thankfully, now there is a second, and in my opinion far more enjoyable, option. Bluestone could have said that Center Parcs already exists, they do everything so well, what is the point of trying to compete with them? They could have bemoaned that someone else had got there first and launched the business that they wanted to launch.

This is the same in any business sector. If you are thinking of starting a service that is already offered by another firm, or starting a new law firm, don’t worry that you already have seemingly unbeatable competition. If your message is even slightly different it will appeal to a different market. The fact that other firms are already offering this service shows that there is a market for it. If you open with the right message you might convert clients from another firm to yours.

I am now a Bluestone Resort convert. If you like this sort of holiday, it is well worth a try. Who are going to be the converts to your new service or law firm?


Sign Up For Blog Alerts – you will be notified each time a new blog is posted:

Don’t Give Up On Your Law Firm Marketing: Go Chrome!

Friday, April 16th, 2010

I have always used Internet Explorer as my primary internet browser. I have used Firefox and Safari to test websites and make sure that they function properly, but pretty much every working day of my life, and most weekends too, I have searched the internet using Internet Explorer as my primary browser. Whilst it worked I had no reason to change. It did all that I asked it to and seemed to work very well.

At one of my regular legal marketing consultancy clients I had to use Firefox because Internet Explorer (IE) kept crashing their wireless network (oops)! However, I did not enjoy the experience and returned to IE as soon as I was back in my office or visiting other clients.

Then suddenly, for no reason I could find or understand, Internet Explorer kept freezing, not only on my computer but Megan and Samuel’s computer too. Now as Dad and household IT fixer this meant I was having to sort out my children’s computers at night as well as my own. I spend a lot of time on computers so this was not a welcome intrusion into my short evening. Enough was enough, IE was swiftly dumped and Google Chrome was tested for a few days.

It worked, did not keep crashing and it had a much bigger display than IE as it cut out a lot of the unecessary junk at the top of the page. So my browsing was much better because I could see more of the websites that I wanted to. Also, the best part, there was no need for a separate search box at the top of the page, you simply type in your search term into the URL address bar and Google knows you are trying to search so presents your results. Simple, yet brilliant.

I had used IE for all of my browsing life, at least 10 meaningful years and then in no time at all they lost me as a user. Google had kept mentioning Google Chrome to me everytime I browsed and searched on Google using IE. Subtly and not so subtly Google kept suggesting I try Chrome as my browser. For a long time I was happy to ignore their messages, UNTIL IE caused me pain and kept crashing. Then I was a Google Chrome convert.

Is this not the same approach you need to take to converting prospects into new clients of your firm? Particularly with commercial lawyers, if you are looking for new clients (and you always should be as if you are ‘Not moving forwards, you are moving backwards’) then when you find a potential client, you have to keep popping up under their noses. If you do not you are missing massive opportunities as it is only when they have a problem with their current solicitor that they will change. If you are not in front of them at that time you will not win their business.

If you have found a prospect that you know would be an excllent client, have kept in touch with that prospect by constantly sending useful information, press cuttings of interest and newsletters, you give yourself a chance of winning that new business. It might take one month, three months or three years. Some of my best clients that I work with on a regular basis first received my free marketing guide 18 months before they instructed me; others two years. I gave myself a chance of them using my services by constantly providing them with useful information. When they were ready to ask for some help with winning new business for their practice, who did they ask? A law firm marketing consultant that had once sent them an email, or one who practised what he preaches and kept in touch with them regularly and provided them with useful information that proved their expertise? Well they are my clients so we know the answer to that one.

It is no different for you. If you want to win a good client, or an excellent referrer, you have to keep going until they are unhappy with their current supplier and decide to find a new one. At that point, if you have done your job well, the only firm they are going to approach is your firm. Now in a race, would you rather be one in a field of 20, or one in a field of one? I know which race you are most likely to win.

Most firms I speak with that mention a prospect they would really love to work with, when I ask them what they have done to try and win their business they explain that they once tried calling them but they could not speak with the decision maker. Once! Once is never enough. Do you want to know the only test to use for deciding when you have made enough of an effort? When the prospect engages your services or tells you never to contact them again. Even on the second option you could try again a few months later as decision makers often change and someone else might be in the buying seat then.

Don’t give up on your law firm marketing, go Chrome and keep going until your prospects submit to your services!

Sign Up For Blog Alerts – you will be notified each time a new blog is posted

I Agree Entirely, But This Doesn’t Apply To My Firm….

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

The above phrase is one that I have heard so many times and causes me to tear my hair out (or what is now left of it). I usually here it when a solicitor has been provided with a new (to them) opportunity to promote their business which works very well, and they respond with:

"Well I can see how it would work for ABC & Co, Or DEF & Co, but it wouldn’t work for my firm. We are different."

In my experience, this answer is always untrue. The person offering the answer is not being deliberately awkward or obstructive, they genuinely believe that there answer is the correct one. Yet in most occasions, they are dismissing the idea out of hand with absolutely no information to back it up with.

When Do I Hear This?

"I am a niche legal practice so there is no way that I can keep in touch with my clients once a month after their matter is completed as I can only talk about one subject"

"Website marketing does not work for attracting new commercial clients"

"I can’t do a legal newsletter, I have nothing interesting to say"

"I can’t ask clients to recommend me to family and friends because that would seem too desperate"

Needless to say I have proved many solicitors wrong when provided with these answers. Are you using these answers to prevent your law firm from flourishing?

Why Do People Do This?

The good news is that this answer is not exclusive to solicitors. I have worked with many different types of businesses and I hear this answer in every sector. It is a "people thing" rather than specifically a "solicitor thing".

So why do people do this? In the legal world I mentioned that I normally hear this answer when offering a solicitor a new marketing opportunity to promote their business. Now if you bear in mind that I am usually only sitting with that firm because they need more clients (or I would not be invited in) this seems rather strange does it not? When you add to that the solicitor has accepted that they are not a marketing expert, again because they have invited me in, this seems even more strange.

I believe that on most occasions rather than “it wouldn’t work for my firm” what the solicitor usually really means is either:

"I don’t understand how this might work and because it is outside my area of expertise I am going to block the idea because I am not comfortable with it"; or

"This scares me and makes me feel uncomfortable so I am not going to do it"; or

"I am in this position with my law firm because I have certain limiting beliefs which are stopping me from moving to the next stage".

Now whichever of these answers is true (or even another variation of them) they are not a conscious answer. It is something from the subconscious stopping the firm from trying something new, something that might prove hugely successful. The trouble is that until you can recognise that you are saying these things you do not even know that you have a problem.

So please, if you hear your self saying "That sounds all well and good, but it doesn’t apply to my law firm", please stop, take check, and analyse why you are saying that.

Sign Up For Blog Alerts – you will be notified each time a new blog is posted

Let Andre Agassi Help Your Law Firm Marketing

Friday, April 9th, 2010

I have recently finished reading Andre Agassi’s book and I have to say I was very pleasantly surprised. I do not read a great deal of sports books because they are all normally too ‘ego-driven’. Agassi’s book certainly is not that. There is a great deal of humility in the book. Agassi shares his feelings about tennis, life and the many challenges that he faced (and he faced huge ones).

Now on my recollection, Agassi was a supreme natural talent that could do anything that he wanted to on a tennis court. When you read the book, you find out that the talent came from a father that drilled so much tennis into Agassi from an early age that he largely hated the game for most of the time that he was playing professionally.

What I really took from the book was a one liner Agassi used several times which really struck home:

If you are not moving forwards, you are moving backwards!

Simple, yet true. If we are not constantly challenging ourselves and our business we are not really fulfilling our potential. If you are doing the same things that you do every day, you are not going to get more and more out of every day, for yourself or for your business. Comfortable, in my experience, and clearly Agassi’s, happens just before you fall off a perch and drop down nastily. Always testing and questioning yourself and considering what else you should be doing to improve your business is vital to stay ahead of the chasing pack. We know in the legal profession that the chasing pack is getting bigger and is also chasing harder.

If you are not moving forwards, you are moving backwards!

Please keep moving forwards, and I thoroughly recommend that you read the Agassi book:

CLICK TO VIEW the Andre Agassi book on Amazon

Sign Up For Blog Alerts – you will be notified each time a new blog is posted

Charging More For Conveyancing Services

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

I have been thinking further about the articles in the Gazette recently and the letters from solicitors stating that conveyancing services can only ever be judged on price. Now I know that this is certainly not the case. I know many solicitors that still charge an incredibly reasonable fee for their services yet I also come across many others that are constantly lowering their price simply to secure the instructions.

If you look outside of the legal world you can see many examples where pricing is not the determining factor. I could buy my food from Waitrose and pay a premium or I could shop at Asda, Lidl or Aldi. The food will be largely the same but the price paid will be significantly different. Food is the largest commodity so if a food retailer can manage to charge a higher price than other food retailers then why should it be any different for solicitors?

If I want to buy a car I could buy a Smart car or I could buy a top of the range Mercedes. Both cars do exactly the same job of transporting me from A to B, however, one of them does so in far more comfort and probably a lot faster. Should it not be the same with conveyancing? If I decide to buy purely on price you and I know that the conveyancer charging the lowest price will have to take on 5 or 10 times more files each month to make the same profit as a conveyancer charging a reasonable fee and handling half the number of cases.

On the flip side of this, the fee-earner charging more will have more time to spend on my file and therefore is less likely to make mistakes. With insurance premiums always on the rise this is a good thing for the practice overall. I have worked with conveyancers that charge a low fee and have rarely been impressed with their client relationship management skills. However, someone who is sufficiently confident to charge a decent fee for their services normally is far more assured and relaxed and more prepared to spend time with their clients. They are able to offer the Mercedes or Waitrose service because they are charging a premium for the privilege. The solicitor and the client both win. Isn’t this better for all concerned?

It is even easier to charge a premium for your service if your are regularly selling your service to returning clients or recommended clients. You are far more likely to have returning and recommended clients if you go out of your way to provide an exceptional service. Of course there will always be the “tyre kickers” who only want to buy on price, but let them go to your competitor. In my experience both in the legal profession and since leaving, those that are prepared to pay a reasonable price for my service are normally the best clients. Those that always try and bargain on price or time turn out to cause the most headaches. I have seen this enough times and spoken to enough solicitors to know that this is a recurring theme. Therefore, if someone is bartering your price and does not appreciate any value to your service let them go to your competitors and let your competitors have the headaches.

Summary

You can choose whether you want to be a low price conveyancing service provider or a high price conveyancing service provider. I firmly believe the second option is the right choice but also accept that this takes time to achieve. However, if you simply give in and charge the lowest prices you will never have a profitable business in the long term. You simply will not be able to compete with the bulk providers such as Halifax or Co-Op Law and they will be able to beat you on price and delivery of service. In my opinion, the only option for the smaller firm is to charge a good price and provide an outstanding service. You will then have more job satisfaction, more clients and more profits in the bank.

Sign Up For Blog Alerts – you will be notified each time a new blog is posted

Site Map | Resources | Privacy and Disclaimer | Delivery Policy | Refunds | Valid XHTML